• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Sunday, June 7, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Sabbah Uddin

Sabbah Uddin

The writer is a versatile analyst and a speaker on contemporary issues

Bells of peace

Published on: March 3, 2020 1:51 AM

March 3, 2020 by Sabbah Uddin

Bells of peace are ringing in Kabul as United States signs a long awaited peace declaration with Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. It was a farcical drop scene as it was the same Talibanwhich Washington dislodged from Kabul after toppling their government soon after 9/11. By the time this agreementwas signed, the moneyspent by the United States has grown several digitsbeyond the initial estimate of$975 billion. When taking intoaccount theincrease in base budgets for the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs, the actual cost can be guesstimated to surpass all previous approximations of expenditure.The United States kept pouring billions of dollars in Afghanistan while the climax turned melodramatic for Washington everywhere including in the Middle East which was outside the script.The bulk of the weary and vexed US tax payer’s money was injudiciously spent on coin (counter-insurgency) operations, meeting logistic needs of the US troops including, medical care, special pay and benefits besides throwing carrots to allies. Washington also ostentatiously contributed about16% of itsfunds spent on reconstructioneffort in Afghanistan. Thus carrots and sticks of counter insurgency and reconstruction campaigns continued side by side. The irony was that the effects of these expensive WHAM (winning hearts and mind) campaigns could not prove helpful as the ill-planned military operationsindifferent to local sensitivities continued to claim civilian lives; euphemistically called frequently occurring collateral damage. Almost half of the money spent on reconstruction went to structure Afghan security forces, including the Afghan National Army. However, as the war ends at least for now, these forces remain weak and vulnerable.

The war in Afghanistan-the longest war for the United States, began in 2001 with a quick win in December 2001, when the Taliban abandoned Kabul. The apparently quick winsturned sour long drawn game of thrones with an unending saga of aggressive military operations, carpet bombings, assassinations, collateral killings and failed political overtures unfolded one after another without any season of peace.

For Afghans this has come at a human expense about 15 times more than that of Pentagon. Pakistan sacrificed 80,000 lives in the background

Sparing the mini nukes, US dropped more lethal bombs and other explosives in Afghanistan than done during any other war. Despite the induction of more boots on ground (BOGs) and pumping full throttle dollars into the war, the Taliban continued to gain strength. Opium production quadrupled, Afghan security forces remained incapable, corruption thrived, and peace remained elusive for war beaten and poverty stricken Afghan populace as chapters of ISIS emerged.

Taliban continued to control a large stretch of areas and where they lost control to ISAF, they continued to contest belligerently. Thus, the United States could never gain full control of the war and the objectives adopted by military top brass furtherlingered on without meeting any success.Some experts on region may believe that at least, the Pentagon’s pressure served one purpose i.e. keeping Taliban under tactical and as well as strategic stress thus persuading them to agree for negotiations.Thus the US military may claim its success as wars are usually fought to bring the other side to table for a discourse towards acceptance of terms for peace. However, I believe that in US-Taliban scenario the cliché “war for peace” cannot be fully validated. It is established that it was not the mere military pressure on Taliban. Pakistan continuously played its diplomatic role to bring Taliban on negotiation table encouraging them to end the prolonged conflagration in Islamabad’s immediate neighborhood. The Langley guys were privy to the fact that Pakistan exercises immense influence in the region and Afghanistan not only falls in Islamabad’s ‘area of interest’ but is also marked on maps in Pentagon as Pakistan’s ‘area of influence’.Islamabad kept the engagements since it was completely understood both by military and civilian leadership in Islamabad that there is no military solution in Afghanistan. Thus, Islamabad continuously focused on political and diplomatic leverages and never lost sight of peace prospects in its ravaged neighborhood. Unfortunately, sensing Pakistan’s interests other players in the region also tried to extend their influence in Kabul. India particularly used the opportunity to launch offensive on every tier and front against Pakistan. China also entered Afghanistan with big ticket anchor investments. However, it was India which was making Islamabad sleepless and uncomfortable right in the back yard. It was complete a success for India when spies in CGO complex New Delhi managed to gain control of certain anti-Pakistan Taliban factions. It definitely threatened Pakistan’s interests besides creating an immediate internal security situation in Pakistan. RAW went too deep into Afghanistan operating with impunity against Pakistan. Islamabad had to face and fight a heinous design of terrorism actually conscripted by Indian spies and Taliban handlers in Afghanistan. Pakistan was feeling the heat of hostility on both the Eastern and Western fronts. What could have made the Indian agent handlers in Qandahar or Jalalabad happy that Pakistan was restlessly trying to stabilize the situation in FATA, Balochistan, Karachi at one time besides fighting every day battle in streets and close alleys in Urban cities. However, with the agreement reached, things have taken a good turn for Pakistan. Definitely this has put Delhi in a weaker position since it has made a huge investment in Kabul with potential of losing the good money after bad money. It is imminent for India to become irrelevant and lose its space that it used against Pakistan in days to come.

The final act of the play in this theatre of blood shows that the parties have now come to terms with a thread of agreement. However, the ink of this agreement has more than 2000 lives for the United States alone.For Afghans this has come at a human expense about 15 times more than that of Pentagon.Pakistan sacrificed 80,000 lives in the background.The United States will evacuate all its forces in the next 14 months while Afghan government will release over 5000 Taliban prisoners serving sentences and undergoing investigations in various prisons. The war seems to come to an end. However the challenge remains. Afghans have not been able to agree on disagreements in the history. The countries with interest driven investment will definitely continue to maintain presence as well as their space. Let’s hope that peace prevails and all stakeholders learn to coopt a peaceful future for the sake of Afghan and Afghanistan.

Writer is a versatile analyst and a speaker on contemporary issues

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Mirra Andreeva wins French Open to claim first Grand Slam title

Antonelli pips Verstappen to Monaco pole

Iran World Cup squad heads to Mexico as US visa row erupts

Bosnia’s World Cup pursuit begins at a home-away-from home in the American Midwest

Football fans urge red card for coach who led Israeli club

Pakistan

All set for Gilgit-Baltistan Elections today

Mohsin Naqvi arrives in Tehran as Pakistan pushes for US-Iran deal

Lebanon army chief visits US-Iran mediator Pakistan

US strikes Iranian sites after Iran launches drones, in latest Gulf flare-up

72 held in AJK crackdown as government defends JAAC ban

More Posts from this Category

Business

PSX new IPOs deliver 47% average return, boosting investor confidence

Pakistan signs MoU with Saudi, local firms to develop Karachi maritime business district

Gold prices witness sharp decline

Gul Ahmed venture QGDC announces $230m investment to set up Pakistan’s largest data centre

SECP takes action against 36 government entities

More Posts from this Category

World

Trump claims Iran missile stockpile shrinking

Young ‘cockroaches’ hold first protest in New Delhi

Ukraine strikes key Russian military sites

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.