• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, July 11, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • FIFA World Cup
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
By Babar Ayaz

By Babar Ayaz

The writer is the author of What’s wrong with Pakistan?

There is no need to cry over no Camp David Afghan peace deal

Published on: September 16, 2019 3:23 AM

September 16, 2019 by By Babar Ayaz

For once, President Trump’s twitter happy fingers sent a message about the Afghan Taliban talks which may be considered as positive although there are many who have criticised him for it.

By cancelling to go ahead with the Camp David meeting to announce the accord with the Afghan Taliban, Trump took a bold stand. It would have otherwise been a stamp of approval for Khalilzad and a complete surrender to the Taliban.

It’s not only the American forces who laid their lives to give Afghanistan a democratic and progressive system of governance, but the Afghan people also paid a heavier price.

The Afghan women must have taken a sigh of relief because the Khalilzad-led agreement with the Islamic emirates of Afghanistan bargained for its soul with the anti-women elements who hadthe track record of destroying women schools and education centres. They also made it compulsory for the women to wear burkas.

In the first place, Americans shouldn’t have attacked and sent their forces to Afghanistan in a knee-jerk reaction. They could have brought down the Afghan Taliban government with the help of the Northern Alliance and at the same time by pressing Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and UAE, the only three governments who recognised the Taliban to completely disassociate with and stop helping& financing the Taliban.

The refusal of the Taliban to talk to the elected government of Afghanistan and Abdullah Abdullah, the chief executive of Afghanistan, who is a popular leader of Northern Alliance, is turning the clock back as the presidential elections are due

As explained by the Steve Coll in his well researched book, Directorate S, Pakistan created a separate clandestine wing to support the Taliban whose link could not be traced back to the government of Pakistan. It is only now that the US acknowledges that Pakistan has facilitated dialogue with the Americans and Afghan Taliban. Pakistan’s connections with the Afghan Taliban may have given the Pakistani establishment some leverage against the growing influence of India in Afghanistan.

All along, much to the resentment of Pakistan’s milt-establishment, the Americans were after Pakistan to do more and we were saying that we don’t have much influence on the Taliban.

But earlier, Pakistan’s attempt to arrange quadrilateral talks between Afghan-Taliban, the US, China and Russia had failed because the Afghan intelligence leaked the story that Mullah Omar, the supreme leader of Taliban, had died months ago in a Pakistan hospital while a fake letter of Mullah Omar in favour of the talks was circulated anonymously. This forced the Afghan-Taliban to announce the new Ameer of their movement, Akhtar Mansour who was killed in May, 2016 by an American drone attack in Pakistan after crossing the border from Iran. It was generally believed that he was not in favour of peace talks with the US and that was the reason that Americans bumped him out.

Consequently, the Taliban selected Hibatullah Akhundzada as the Ameer of Afghan Taliban. He was running a madrassah in a village in Pakistan near the Afghan border. The fact that Mullah Omar died in a Pakistan hospital, his successor Mullah Mansour was killed in a drone attack in a border city in Pakistan and was also carrying a Pakistani passport on which he had travelled to UAE several times and that the new leader of Afghan-Taliban was residing in Pakistan and running a camp all gave credence to the accusations by the US and the Afghan government that Pakistan is giving shelter to the leaders of the Afghan-Taliban. But this was always denied by the Pakistan Foreign Office.

On the other side, the presence of the Haqqani group leaders in the tribal areas was also denied by the Pakistani establishment, knowing full well that Afghan and the US do not believe in our denials.

So whenever the US and the Afghan government insisted that Pakistan should do more, the Pakistani government detracted the whole discussion to the operation against Pakistani-Taliban and maintained that Pakistan had suffered the killing of 70,000 people, including members of the armed forces personnel and innocent civilians, in the war against terrorism. It may be noted that the Pakistan-Taliban were initially the creation of our own establishment. However, the establishment only went against them when they revolted against their masters and became Frankenstein.

The refusal of the Taliban to talk to the elected government of Afghanistan and Abdullah Abdullah, the chief executive of Afghanistan, who isa popular leader of Northern Alliance, is turning the clock back as the presidential elections are due.

The Taliban, who don’t believe in democracy, should have been pushed to accept to participate in the upcoming elections and if they win that, instead of killing people in terrorist attacks, they are most welcome to establish their rule in Afghanistan, but not by just relying on terrorist attacks.

The Islamists are one-time democrats and once elected, they show their fascist colours under the garb of implementing a medieval set of values. Don’t we have the example of Muslim brotherhood’s Morsi?

Pakistan has finally changed its strategy to not use non-state actors for promoting its national security policy. This has been done more because of international pressure and the fear of economic sanctions from IMF and FATF. This policy was under change from the time Pakistan had to fight the Pakistani-Taliban. And Gen Kayani declared that Pakistan’s biggest threat was from within. Pakistani army has fought bravely against the Pakistani-Taliban and also eventually after 70 years merged FATA with KP. A bold step which was long overdue.

The writer is the author of What’s wrong with Pakistan?

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Madonna releases new edition of fresh record ‘Confessions II’

50 Cent reacts as his P Diddy documentary earns three Emmy nominations

Adnan Sami releases four musical tributes dedicated to Ayatollah Khamenei

Will there be a ‘Crazy Rich Asians’ sequel?

Sinner beats Djokovic to set up Wimbledon final vs Zverev

Pakistan

17 more killed in Balochistan anti-terror purge

Pakistan scrambles to salvage peace memo as Trump reiterates Iran ceasefire is ‘over’

Govt raises petrol, diesel prices by over Rs 13 per litre

GB’s uplift tops government’s to-do list, says PM

More K2 wreckage recovered, search for missing crew continues

More Posts from this Category

Business

World Bank approves $376m to boost Pakistan’s electricity grid

Thar Block II: SECMC prepares for Phase III expansion

Pakistan signs LoI with Plug and Play to strengthen startup ecosystem

Rupee marginally up against dollar

Gold prices decline by Rs 1,400 per tola

More Posts from this Category

World

Israeli drones strike Lebanon despite US-brokered framework deal

Global oil production recovers as Hormuz shipments resume, IEA says

Bangladesh’s Hasina plans December return with party colleagues to surrender

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}