• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Agencies

27th Amendment clears another hurdle

Published on: November 10, 2025 12:51 AM

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, addresses the 23rd Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Summit, hosted virtually by India, in Islamabad, Pakistan July 4, 2023. Press Information Department (PID)/Handout via REUTERSPakistan’s PM addresses the 23rd SCO Summit, hosted virtually by India, in Islamabad

The standing committees on law and justice of both houses of Parliament approved on Sunday the draft of a bill for a 27th Constitutional Amendment after some changes, Senator Farooq H. Naek told reporters after a meeting that was convened to deliberate on the proposed changes.

He said that he and Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar had been authorised to make changes to some clauses of the bill, without sharing anymore details about the said clauses.

Alongside him, Tarar said they would submit a report on the proposals finalised by the committees to the Senate today (Monday).

The bill for Constitution (Twenty-Seventh Amendment) Act, 2025 was tabled before the Senate on Saturday, hours after it was approved by the federal cabinet, triggering noisy protests from the opposition over the pace and scope of the proposed changes.

That initial draft of the bill proposed the creation of a Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), changes to the appointment process for high court judges, a higher cap on provincial cabinets, and changes to the military leadership structure.

Subsequently, the bill was referred to the Senate’s and National Assembly’s Committees on Law and Justice for further deliberation. The committees had met for the purpose yesterday, and the session was reconvened on Sunday.

Senate Committee on Law and Justice Chairperson Senator Farooq H. Naek and his counterpart for the National Assembly panel, MNA Chaudhry Mahmood Bashir Virk, co-chaired Sunday’s meeting.

Lawmakers of the PTI, the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) and Majlis Wahdat-i-Muslimeen (MWM), meanwhile, continued their boycott of the parliamentary committee.

Tarar and Minister of State for Law and Justice Barrister Aqeel Malik were also among those who participated in the meeting. Deputy Prime Minister and PML-N leader Ishaq Dar, too, briefly attended the proceedings.

PML-N Senator Khalil Tahir Sindhu, Awami National Party’s (ANP) Hidayatullah Khan, and PPP MNAs Kasim Gilani and Syed Abrar Ali Shah were also part of the joint moot, while PML-N MNA Shumaila Rana attended via video link.

Earlier, when the meeting was paused for lunch break, Naek said while speaking to the media that “discussions on three points were yet to be completed – transfers of cases from one high court to another high court, transfer of judges from high court to another high court and Article 243 (command of the armed forces).”

The discussion on these matters would be resumed after lunch, he said, adding that some objections had been raised pertaining to the transfer of judges and cases.

“Discussions are ongoing regarding this and it is hoped that a consensus will be reached,” he further stated.

Prior to Sunday’s meeting, when Naek was asked about suggestions made by various ruling allies and whether “two parties had come face to face on the immunity for the president and prime minister”, the PPP senator had affirmed that all parties had a right to voice their opinion.

Noting that the proposals of the PML-N and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) would be considered in the meeting, Naek said, “Decisions will be taken based on whatever the majority’s opinion is.”

During another break, ANP’s Hidayatullah Khan had told reporters that the committee had sought time until tomorrow to decide on his party’s suggestion for changing the name of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

Meanwhile, Tarar had told reporters it was decided that provinces be taken into confidence on changing the province’s name. MQM-P’s suggestion regarding local governments was also discussed, he added.

Earlier, Tarar had said the joint committees had completed “85 per cent of the work” and expressed the hope that the deliberations would be over by the evening.

He had also highlighted PM Shehbaz Sharif’s directives issued earlier in the day to withdraw the amendments proposing legal immunity for premiers.

Referring to the JUI-F’s absence, the law minister had stated its members had informed the committee yesterday about their party’s policy. He emphasised that parliamentary parties should utilise their right to vote, rather than boycotting the process altogether.

After Saturday’s meeting, Tarar had told reporters that all parliamentary parties were participating in the process and that the government had also “requested the opposition to contribute constructively”.

“Till the time we do not reach a consensus, from all members of both Houses, the discussions will continue,” the law minister had said.

Prior to Sunday’s meeting, it was reported that the standing committees were likely to finalise the mechanism for the transfer of high court judges through the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) – a process which may not require the consent of the judges being transferred.

The panels cleared nearly 80 per cent of the proposed bill on Saturday in a joint in-camera meeting, including most clauses of the judicial reforms package. But deliberations on the field marshal’s status under Article 243 (command of the armed forces) of the Constitution were deferred until Sunday.

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had held consultations with multiple ruling allies on Thursday, meeting with the top leadership of the MQM-P, the PML-Q, the Istehkam-i-Pakistan Party (IPP), the Balochistan Awami Party (BAP), the ANP and the PML-Zia.

However, no meeting was reported between the government and the PTI.

Filed Under: Pakistan Tagged With: 27th Amendment, azam nazeer tarar, bill, clears another hurdle

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Saudi delegation explores Pakistan investments

NEPRA cuts electricity tariff nationwide

NDMA warns of floods and landslides across Pakistan

Musk applauds Pakistan’s justice system

Pakistan clinches ODI series against Australia

Pakistan

Saudi delegation explores Pakistan investments

NDMA warns of floods and landslides across Pakistan

Shehbaz prioritises export-led economic growth

Foreign Office denies US information sharing

Security forces kill four terrorists in KP

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP reserves rise by $43 million

Business leaders distrust upcoming FY27 budget

PM Shehbaz orders pilot of automated tax system

Pakistan to unveil budget on June 10

PM Shehbaz pushes tariff reforms, orders AI upgrade

More Posts from this Category

World

Musk applauds Pakistan’s justice system

PM Shehbaz lauds strategic ties with Washington

Gulf crisis drives India-Venezuela oil partnership

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.