Trump’s military doctrine and its implications

Author: Khurram Minhas

None of the presidents in American history have scuttled agreements as Donald Trump has done in the past two years. Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Paris Climate Agreement, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces treaty (INF) and Iran Nuclear Deal are glaring examples of Trump’s flip flop policies.

Trump has mercurial tendencies with unexpected and unpredicted decisions. He is following the doctrine of disengagement from various overseas military commitments mainly Syria and Afghanistan. He wants his other NATO member countries to contribute more in the organization. Southeast Asian allies have also been asked to pay more for their security. Consequently, his actions have created anxiety amongst American allies. Why does Trump maintain such a fickle attitude on strategic front?

Primarily, it is because of America’s domestic politics and Trump’s own campaign promises that compelled him to adopt this unpopular and premature military doctrine. In American history, reelection has remained a top priority for the Presidents in the first term and in the second term they try to find a possible place in history. It means Trump has started preparations for his 2020 Presidential elections campaign.

There is a general consensus that chaotic regions particularly in the Middle East and South Asia protect American strategic and economic interests.

There is a general consensus that chaotic regions particularly in the Middle East and South Asia protect American strategic and economic interests. The sense of insecurity provides a conducive business environment for the military industrial complex of the US

The sense of insecurity provides a conducive business environment for the military industrial complex of the US. For instance, US signed a deal worth US$20 billion to supply F-15 jets to Qatar amid latter’s insecurity owing to blockade by the Saudi Arabia and its allies. These defence contractors are the backbone for election campaigns in American politics. The American Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Rule 501 (C) (4) allows groups and individuals to lobby for Congress and Presidential candidates through generous donations for political campaigns. Due to these generous donations, policymakers in general and Presidents of the US in particular try to secure interests of these individuals and groups, which largely affect the foreign policy of the US.

Therefore, the role of defence contractors is vital in Trump’s abrupt withdrawal from Syria, exit from Iran Nuclear deal and the unilateral drawdown from Afghanistan. Peace in Middle East and Iran nuclear deal is detrimental to their economic interests. For instance, Lockheed Martin that manufactures F-22 fighter jets had lobbied against the Iran Nuclear deal and financially supported Trump’s election campaign. It had hired Heritage Foundation, which wrote a series of articles and policy papers to manage perceptions of American public and policymakers. Resultantly, Trump expanded sanctions on Iran and enhanced arms sales to American allies in the region, namely Saudi Arabia and Israel.

Trump’s domestic compulsions and military doctrine have drastic ramifications on his allies in South Asia, Middle East and beyond. The US Senator Lindsey Graham contemplates that Trump’s doctrine will add resentment and feeling of abandonment among allies. Trump’s military doctrine has been openly criticized by Syrian Kurds and Afghan government. In case of Syria, the unilateral withdrawal of the US from the Kurdish region has provided an opportunity for Turkey and Assad regime to regain control of the Kurdish region. Turkey has many times threatened an invasion of northeastern Syria. This is why the Syrian Kurds have considered withdrawal as betrayal.

In case of Afghanistan, it is widely believed that the announcement of drawdown during the next 18 months will not only boost morale of Afghan Taliban but also may damage the legitimacy of Afghan government.

Moreover, the insecurity would further damage the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and the already fragile economy of the country. This is why the Afghan government has labeled it a premature decision.

To conclude, Trump has been trying to prove to the American public that he is a man of his word. He wants to be seen as different from other American politicians who often speak a lot but remain reluctant to take decisions. In 2016, he contested elections on his promises and he seems committed to contest the election of 2020 as well. Therefore, this year will more likely witness a series of such hasty and unpredicted actions from the American President.

The writer is a PhD candidate at NUST and a Researcher at IPRI

Published in Daily Times, February 21st 2019.

Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Pakistan

Iran hails Pakistan’s determination to complete gas pipeline project

Iran has hailed Pakistan's political determination to complete the gas pipeline project between the two…

6 hours ago
  • Pakistan

IHC to hear bail pleas in £190m NCA scandal case tomorrow

Chief Justice of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) Aamer Farooq has confirmed to the defence…

6 hours ago
  • Lifestyle

Pakistani celebrities and public disappointed with ‘Heeramandi’

In the latest saga of entertainment discourse, the much-anticipated Netflix series "Heeramandi: The Diamond Bazaar"…

6 hours ago
  • Lifestyle

Salman Khan’s old letter resurfaces, expresses gratitude to fans

A handwritten letter penned by Bollywood superstar Salman Khan from the 1990s has resurfaced, igniting…

6 hours ago
  • Lifestyle

Dua Lipa feels ‘luckiest’ as her ‘Saturday Night Live’ dream comes true

Dua Lipa recently took on a dual role as both guest host and musical performer…

6 hours ago
  • Lifestyle

Durefishan slays in white pishwas

Durefishan Saleem, the beautiful actress of the Pakistani showbiz industry, looked stunning in white 'Pishwas'…

6 hours ago