“The resumption of a meeting, after a period of about three months, is something which is alien to the law and common sense,” said Justice Isa. “In any event, the composition of the JCP has undergone a change since the last meeting. And, how can the meeting of July 28, 2022, be stated to be ‘resumed on October 24, 2022’ with a different agenda?” he questioned, adding that the agenda for the meeting of July 28 was to consider four junior judges and the chief justice of the Peshawar High Court.
“But the agenda of the meeting for October 24 is to consider three junior judges and the Chief Justice of the Islamabad High Court,” he maintained in the letter. Justice Isa also stated that putting forward the names of three junior judges whose nominations have already been rejected “disparages and disrespects the honourable members” and undermines the credibility and integrity of the JCP. Justice Isa furthered that the CJP Bandial didn’t “deign it appropriate to discuss what he was proposing, or even inform him”, despite the fact that he occupies a room next to his.
In a scathing criticism, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar slammed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) after the party…
The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court has rejected the PTI plea seeking to take…
The first four months of the current fiscal year showed better than expected improvement marked…
Federal Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi has announced that from December 31, no Afghan nationals will…
The ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel, two longstanding rivals, was welcomed by the people of…
The Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) is witnessing what was predicted, turbulence. The stock gains in…
Leave a Comment