The 18th Youm-e-Takbeer

Author: Beenish Altaf

1998 observed the overt nuclearisation of South Asia when both arch-rivals, Pakistan and India, detonated their nuclear devices. 1998 is celebrated as the advent of second nuclear age, whereas the first being the Cold War that ended in 1991. Consequently, the peril of horizontal proliferation in South Asia embodied another nuclear arms race after the end of the Cold War. Till now, both Pakistan and India have persistently developed more than the number of nuclear weapons than what they had in 1998. Analysts believe that both countries have meticulously developed enough nuclear weapons to destroy each other thrice.
The number of nuclear weapons in South Asia, no matter whether it is strategic or tactical, gives birth to numerous hard questions on the deterrence equilibrium and strategic stability. For example, how much of a numerical advantage or additional nuclear weaponry does Delhi and Islamabad think they need over the other? Is Islamabad and New Delhi over-reliant on their nuclear arsenals? Critics believe that for maintaining credible minimum deterrence, the credibility of a sufficient number of nuclear weapons has more significance than a trivial nuclear superiority.

The arms race stability in South Asia benefited Pakistan to maintain its minimum, sufficient, survivable and potent nuclear weapons, whereas most of the critics believe that the pace is inexcusably fast. Nevertheless, Pakistan attributed its development of nuclear weapons to the widening conventional asymmetry with its neighbour. It is argued that conventional asymmetry is inversely proportional to lower nuclear threshold, which resulted into a terrible nuclear weapons development in South Asia. Pakistan is advocating the rising conventional disparity, putting it in a perilous road to maintain credible minimum deterrence. One critic raised questions about CMD as renunciation of nuclear war fighting.

Ironically, Pakistan is surrounded by two nuclear neighbours, and that is the basic reason that motivated Pakistan for nuclear tests, and that was the best timely decision by Pakistan. As there was need to maintain balance of power and necessary deterrence in the region keeping in mind the ever untrustworthy relations between Pakistan and India.

However, it is imperative to highlight the most concrete driving agent behind such crucial and highly-criticised decision of conducting nuclear weapons test by Pakistan. It was India that had actually started this race of acquisition of nuclear weapons in the region. It was India that actually upset the balance of power in the region. Though Pakistan was long claiming that it did possess nuclear technology but did not intend to test the weapons. However, circumstances nudged Pakistan to test nuclear weapons for deterrence and balancing of power. No country can overlook its security concerns and issues.

Pakistan has fought multiple wars and has had many borders collision with its immediate neighbour India since its inception. Furthermore, India ironically designed its Pakistan-centric foreign policy to prevail its supremacy in the region and also lobbied with developed nations. It is an open secret that numerous trade and military sanctions were introduced to impose on Pakistan in that decade. However, the US did impose a few on Pakistan. But the then government of Pakistan took a hard decision of not giving up to international pressure and triggered the button of nuclear weapons test to maintain sovereignty and security of Pakistan. Local and foreign observers acknowledge that without being a nuclear power, the country might have suffered a serious setback when its eastern neighbour had amassed troops on the border in a threatening posture in 2002.

History of nuclear weapons in the region can be traced backed to 1974 when New Delhi showed its intent to become a nuclear power. During the same time period, it exploded an atomic device, a weapon of mass destruction and named it “Smiling Buddha” rather ironically. After that incident, the then prominent leader of Pakistan, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, commissioned a team of experts to begin preparations to respond on the basis of “even if the nation has to eat grass” to achieve it. Fortunately, succeeding rulers also understood the need and didn’t prove to be an obstacle in the way of achieving the target of becoming a nuclear power.

After the bold decision of conducting a nuclear weapons test, Pakistan faced isolation at international stage. The facts were not highlighted by international media, particularly in the context of ever-existing threat to Pakistan from its conventional rival India. New Delhi’s shrewd policies, particularly of acting as a hostile upper riparian and its adamant stand on Kashmir, cannot by any stretch of imagination be termed friendly.

May 28 is the day to acknowledge the efforts of many scientists for making Pakistan’s security unconquered and unchallenged. May 28, 1998 was a remarkable day not only for Pakistan but also for the whole region as the threat of unbalanced power in the region lost its existence. May Pakistan being nuclear power would be able to play its due role in maintaining peace in the world. Long Live Pakistan!

The writer is a research associate at the Strategic Vision Institute and can be reached at beenishaltaf7@gmail.com

Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Pakistan

A revolutionary approach to Cancer, and the role of Art in Healing; A series of talks by Dr. Azra Raza at LUMS

November 23, 2024: “No one is winning the war on cancer.” These sobering words from…

4 hours ago
  • Business

Fatima Fertilizer, in partnership with UNDP, is the first company in Pakistan to adopt the SDGs Impact Framework

Islamabad, November 21, 2024 – Fatima Fertilizer has the distinct honor of becoming the first…

4 hours ago
  • Op-Ed

FIRST WOMAN CHIEF JUSTICE OF LAHORE HIGH COURT

Law plays a crucial role in shaping and maintaining a civilized society. It ensures order,…

4 hours ago
  • Op-Ed

Internet Ban

In today's world, the Internet is an indispensable tool for education, communication, business, and innovation.…

11 hours ago
  • Op-Ed

Chaos Fuels Gold’s Ascent

Gold has long stood as a symbol of wealth, security, and timeless value. In an…

11 hours ago
  • Op-Ed

Trump 2.0: The Financial Ripple Effect

Donald Trump's return to the White House in 2025 could mark a seismic shift in…

11 hours ago