Nepra dismisses two Chinese power firms’ motion for leave

Author: By Abrar Hamza

KARACHI: The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) has dismissed the motion for leave for review of two Chinese companies’ against the decision of the authority.

The authority had given the decision in 2014 about reconsideration request filed by government of Pakistan in the matter of upfront tariff for coal power projects.

After reviewing the motions for leave for review filed against the determination of the authority, on June 26, 2014, the authority has come up with same decision and dismissed the motion for leave for review citing many deficiencies.

Motion for Leave for Review was filed by M/s Irfan & Associates on behalf of China National Import & Export Corporation and Babcock & Wilcox Beijing Company Ltd. against the Decision of the authority regarding reconsideration request filed by Government of Pakistan in the matter of upfront tariff for coal power projects for information. China National Import & Export Corporation and Babcock & Wilcox Beijing Company Ltd submitted the motion for leave for review on May 30, 2016 against the decision of the Nepra dated June 26, 2014 in the matter of upfront tariff for coal power projects.

However, Nepra after considering the instant review motion observed some deficiencies includes that the subject review motion is hopelessly time barred. ‘The Petitioner has also failed to bring any material evidence before the Authority which the Authority may consider to condone the delay’, authority added.

Nepra in its decision said the petitioner was also not a party in the earlier proceedings; proceedings for determination of Upfront Tariff for coal power projects decided vide order dated 26.06.2014 and proceedings leading to its revised order issued vide decision dated 21.11.2014. Hence, the Review Motion is also liable to be dismissed on the ground that the Petitioner has no locus standi.

A motion for leave is a motion filed with the court seeking permission to deviate from an established rule or procedure of the court. The most common use of a motion for leave is to seek an extension to an already-passed timeframe.

Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Lifestyle

Sophia Bader’s short stories collection Rangrez launched at Alhamra

A book launch ceremony for "Rangrez," the new collection of short stories by renowned writer,…

4 seconds ago
  • Lifestyle

Ayeza to share the screen with Shahrukh Khan in her next project?

Is Pakistani showbiz A-lister Ayeza Khan set for a Bollywood debut opposite megastar Shah Rukh…

26 seconds ago
  • Lifestyle

Himanshi Khurana all praise for Saba Qamar’s acting prowess

Bigg Boss Season 13 contender and Indian actress Himanshi Khurana has revealed that Saba Qamar…

31 seconds ago
  • Pakistan

Ziarat to be introduced as international tourist destination: CM Bugti

Chief Minister Balochistan Mir Sarfraz Bugti on Friday said that in the next two years,…

8 mins ago
  • Pakistan

Malaysian Air Force Chief calls on Chief of Air Staff

During his first-ever visit to Pakistan, General Tan Sri Dato' Sri Mohd Asghar Khan bin…

9 mins ago
  • Pakistan

LHC orders schools to provide student transport after winter break

The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Friday ordered all schools to provide pick-and-drop transport services…

9 mins ago