The SJC had initiated the proceedings over Justice Isa’s alleged non-disclosure in wealth returns of three London properties acquired on lease in the name of his wife and children between 2011 and 2015.
Seven judges referred matter to the FBR for tax proceedings against Justice Qazi Faez Isa s wife & children, however, three judges Justice Baqar, Justice Mansoor and Justice Yahya did not endorse majority view to refer matter to FBR.
Through his petition, Justice Isa pleaded before the Supreme Court to consider and declare that the Asset Recovery Unit (ARU) constituted by the government to investigate his family’s properties was illegal and working without any legal effect and any of the actions taken by the unit with regard to the reference against the petitioner judge and his family was thereby illegal and of no legal effect.
The petition also claimed that no search was ever conducted and the names and property details of the petitioner’s family were gathered through surveillance.
The case was wrapped up after Justice Isa’s spouse provided the money trail pertaining to her foreign properties and the Federal Board of Revenue provided its input on the matter.
Starlink, the satellite internet service from SpaceX, has received regulatory approval to launch in Pakistan.…
The Punjab government has turned down Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's (PTI) request to hold a rally at…
Hasan Nawaz played a match-winning knock in his T20I debut series, scoring a blistering 44-ball…
Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb is feeling hopeful about reaching a deal with the International Monetary…
In his latest podcast, Ahmed Ali Butt claimed the Aurat March movement was “heavily funded”…
Haris Rauf has made history by taking his 200th international wicket during the third T20I…
Leave a Comment