Daily Times

BEIJING: China will position itself as free trade’s new champion at an Asia-Pacific summit this weekend, with the Communist government seeking to project economic leadership as a US-led Pacific Rim trade pact languishes under President-elect Donald Trump.

Beijing aims to capitalize on the Trump-induced coma of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), with President Xi Jinping selling alternate visions for regional trade at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) meeting this weekend in Peru.

“If the US gives up its leadership here, of course China will take the role,” said Tu Xinquan, a trade expert at Beijing’s University of International Business and Economics, who has advised China’s government on trade issues. On the campaign trail, Trump labeled the TPP, championed by President Barack Obama, a “disaster”. Obama last week abandoned efforts to win congressional approval for the TPP before Trump takes office, saying its fate was up to the President-elect and Republican lawmakers.

The China-backed Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a rival pact that excludes the United States, has become the front-runner for new free trade deals in the region. The RCEP and the TPP — which excludes China — were viewed as parallel, if competing pathways, to an eventual broader Asia-Pacific free trade zone. But when Beijing hosted the APEC meeting in 2014 and pushed the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP) as a framework for liberalizing Pacific Rim trade, the United States saw it as a distraction from TPP.

Now, the RCEP is likely the main avenue to a future FTAAP, giving China, as the largest economy among the deal’s 16 countries, a driving role in the future of Asia-Pacific trade.

Obama had argued that the TPP would allow the United States and not China to write the rules of trade for the region.

China’s efforts to push trade pacts coincide with other soft power initiatives aimed at cementing the country’s economic influence, such as Xi’s global One Belt, One Road infrastructure plan and the Beijing-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

Claire Reade, senior counsel at US law firm Arnold & Porter and a former Assistant US Trade Representative for China Affairs, said China would seek to contrast its commitment to the region with US inconstancy.

“The geopolitical realities and China’s economic diplomacy make it seem unlikely the smaller countries in the region would spurn China’s leadership,” she said. In a sign of frustration with the United States among some TPP members, Peru’s president has said that Pacific-rim countries can forge a new trade deal to replace TPP that includes China and Russia but not the United States.

This week, Peru’s trade minister said it was engaging China on ways to get involved with RCEP negotiations. If Lima joined the talks, which is unlikely until existing members come to terms, it would be the only participant from the Americas and could encourage other TPP signatories in Latin America to follow suit.

Other TPP members, including staunch US ally Australia, have said they will pursue other free trade options in Asia. Malaysia has said it would shift its focus from TPP to RCEP, and Vietnam, which is also party to both deals, will shelve its ratification of TPP due to political changes in Washington.

China’s Commerce Ministry did not respond to faxed questions on the trade deals, but Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang downplayed Beijing’s role.

“No matter if it is the RCEP or the FTAAP, neither is being led by China,” Geng told a regular press briefing on Friday, adding that China was working together with all parties to advance negotiations.

Trade experts say that in addition to dealing a blow to US influence, TPP’s failure could mean US goods lose out on lower tariffs and market access to RCEP countries, including Japan, China and India. Proposed dates for an agreement have come and gone, but an RCEP deal could be reached as soon as next year.

Deborah Elms, who runs the Singapore-based Asian Trade Centre consultancy and advises governments, said the lack of US involvement in future trade deals could spur more off-shoring by US companies.