Daily Times

The move could further worsen the tense situation: Indian action also challenged China’s sovereignty, while Pakistan’s permanent delegate, Maleeha Lodhi, said that the Security Council meeting had proved the occupied Kashmir was not an internal matter of India. India’s claims were rejected. She briefed the media after the UN Security Council’s closed consultation meeting to review the situation in Jammu and Kashmir.

Concerned over the situation in occupied Kashmir, no other representative other than the Chinese ambassador came out of the meeting. Chinese Ambassador Zhang Jun told the media that the situation in Kashmir was very tense and dangerous. He said the human rights situation in India was also very disturbing. He also said that India’s unilateral action on occupied Kashmir could worsen the already tense situation.

The case of occupied Jammu and Kashmir has been between Pakistan and India for a long time, but according to UN resolutions, Kashmir is a globally recognised dispute. He said that the constitutional amendment on India’s termination of the special status of occupied Kashmir. The Chinese delegation said the Kashmir issue should be resolved peacefully in accordance with the UN Charter, agreements and bilateral agreements. India’s move also challenged China’s sovereignty and violated bilateral agreements to maintain peace and stability in the region. China has strong reservations on it, he added, given that India’s unilateral measures are unviable for relations with China.

In this regard, the position of Pakistan, which is the sole lawyer of Kashmiris in the world, also came open to the world. Maleeha Lodhi said the Security Council meeting had rejected the Indian government’s claims that “the voice of the people of Jammu and Kashmir was heard at the level of the world’s highest forum Security Council. Which is proof that occupied Kashmir is not an internal matter of India.”

Rajnath has not only threatened the nuclear war but also proved to be an irresponsible nuclear force

She maintained that the meeting had also expressed concerns over human rights violations. The meeting had ratified UN resolutions regarding the Kashmir dispute. Apart from China, another permanent member of the Security Council had also expressed regret over the Kashmir situation and suggested investigating the Indian atrocities in the occupied valley. Lodhi described it as a diplomatic success of Pakistan.

Along with these global efforts, India’s hit religion is on the other side and India’s war is on the upswing. Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh said he could change the policy of not taking the initiative in a nuclear attack.

In my opinion, based on the future situation in Kashmir, Rajnath has not only threatened the nuclear war but also proved to be an irresponsible nuclear force. In his pride, he has given proof that the Kashmir problem can disrupt world peace with a nuclear war. The most important responsibility of any powers imposed on it would be to find an acceptable and satisfactory solution for all parties.

There is no doubt that the Modi government’s threat of nuclear war is a major threat to India’s global peace. The change in nuclear policy has also proved that India is a threat to world peace and that the provocative statement of Indian Defense Minister Rajnath is pushing the region towards a nuclear war. The question also arises whether India has threatened the UN ahead of the UN Security Council meeting? Rajnath’s statement points to a dangerous extremist thinking and the threat of nuclear war. The world has to take notice of this threat. India’s defence minister said, “What happens in the future depends on the circumstances.”

His statement has created uncertainty in the matter of national security. It is understood that India announced nuclear power in 1998. After a short break, Pakistan responded to nuclear power in response to Indian nuclear explosions. India’s political analyst and defence expert, Shekhar Gupta, said the Indian government was looking broadly at the issue of the non-use of nuclear weapons and these comments could also be related to Pakistan. “Rajnath Singh talks thoughtfully, he is not talking about a transition from the policy but he is thinking broadly about the NFU’s (first-first) policy on nuclear weapons,” he added.

US President Donald Trump has expressed concern over the situation in South Asia as a result of India’s move to abolish the special status of Occupied Kashmir. Aziz Khan informed the US President about Modi’s aggressive actions and Indian atrocities. In a statement issued by White House Assistant Press Secretary John Hogan, the US President stressed the importance of the situation in Jammu and Kashmir and that India and Pakistan should reduce tensions through bilateral talks. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Imran Khan has said that all attempts by the fascist Modi government to embrace Kashmir’s struggle for independence would fail miserably.

In his tweets, the Prime Minister has said the fascist Modi government, seeking Hindu supremacy, should understand that it is possible to defeat armies, militants and terrorists through superior military force.

Yet, history has witnessed that when a nation unites for independence by getting rid of the fear of death, no force can stop it from reaching its destination. The prime minister maintained that this was the reason why the Modi government’s Hindutva priest would fall on his face with all his brutal tactics in occupied Kashmir.

The writer is a lawyer and partner at UMR Practice