Daily Times

ISLAMABAD: The government, for the sake of saving the skin of the prime minister in the event of his conviction in the Panama case in the Supreme Court, approved the twenty-fourth amendment bill in the National Assembly Standing Committee on Law and Justice despite the opposition rejecting the timing of the amendment.

The committee met on Monday under the Chairmanship of MNA Bashir Virk in the Parliament House. In the committee, Pakistan People’s Party Parliamentarian (PPPP) and Pakistan Tehreek-e- Insaf (PTI) opposed the timing of the twenty-fourth amendment bill because the prime minister’s case being heard by the Supreme Court and the government wanting to give right of appeal to the prime minister on a suo moto notice of the apex court.

The committee considered the Constitution (Twenty-Fourth Amendment) Bill 2016. MNA Naveed Qamar of the PPPP said though his party was not against the amendment but against the timing of it. He said especially when the Supreme Court was hearing the Panama case against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and the government wants to save the prime minister through this amendment if he was convicted in this case.

He demanded of the government not to approve the amendment till the apex court’s decision on the Panama case. MNA Ayaz Soomro of PPPP said that he brought a similar type of bill in 2015 but it was shot down in the National Assembly. After that, the government was saying that they would bring the amendment regarding the matter soon.

MNA Dr Arif Alvi from PTI said that at present, the public perception is that the government wants to save the PM and there also needed to be some amendments made to it. MNA SA Iqbal Quadri of Muttahida Quami Movement (MQM) supported the amendment and suggested that filing application for right of appeal should be allowed within seven days and decision of appeal within 60 days.

MNA Aisha Syed of Jamaat-e-Islami opposed the amendment and said that the Supreme Court should take suo moto notice on basic and fundamental human rights and there should not be right of appeal on it.