SC halts trial of minor maid’s case

Author: Syed Sabeeh

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Wednesday halted the trial of minor maid Tayyaba’s torture case, which was being tried before Judicial Magistrate Syed Haider Ali Shah.

“Keeping in view the background of the case which is publicly known, we while exercising jurisdiction to do complete justice under Article 184(3) of the constitution, direct the learned High Court to consider whether the case titled State vs Maheen Zafar pending before Syed Haider Ali Shah Judicial Magistrate should be transferred to its own jurisdiction,” the court ruled.

A three-member bench, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Saqib Nisar, heard a civil miscellaneous application, filed by Asma Jahangir.

On January 4, the CJP had taken suo motu notice of alleged torture of the minor maid by the wife of Additional District and Sessions Judge Khurram Ali.

On the next day, Asma filed an application, seeking action against the accused judge.

During the hearing, Asma revealed that the prosecution had not invoked relevant sections of slavery and human trafficking in the challan, adding that it had not been submitted before the trial court. She said that it was now the question of transferring the case.

She informed the court that she was being pressed to step down from the litigation, adding that at the same time the state was not interested to perform its obligation.

During the hearing, Justice Saqib Nisar observed that they would take the issue to its logical conclusion.

Asma contended that under Section 526 of CrPC only an interested party or the advocate general could approach for transfer of the case, adding that when the state was not helping out in the matter then the court should direct transferring of the case.

She requested the court to appoint a special prosecutor from another province to probe the matter.

The CJP observed that it was the responsibility of the state to ensure protection of life, adding that the court would try to achieve the objectives within the parameters of law and constitution.

Additional Attorney General Waqar Rana told the court that there was no restriction and the court was empowered under Article 187 to direct the high court when fundamental rights were involved in a matter.

Waqar said the court can examine it under Article 187 of the constitution.

Later, the court adjourned the hearing until March 21 with the ruling that the issue of custody of the minor would be decided on next hearing.

Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Sports

South Africa edge ahead in 1st test against Pakistan

Fast bowler Corbin Bosch continued his strong debut with a record-breaking half century to help…

6 hours ago
  • Sports

Two killed in wild weather on Sydney-Hobart yacht race

Two sailors have been killed in separate incidents in the treacherous Sydney to Hobart yacht…

6 hours ago
  • Sports

Taylor Fritz motivated for Slam success after low-key off-season

Taylor Fritz said Friday he strategically limited his workload during the brief tennis off-season before…

6 hours ago
  • Sports

India lose five after Smith’s heroics put Australia in charge of 4th Test

Australia's fiery pace attack destroyed India's top order on Friday to put them in the…

6 hours ago
  • Sports

Iga Swiatek not expecting WADA appeal over doping scandal

World number two Iga Swiatek said on Friday she was ready to put a drugs…

6 hours ago
  • Sports

Elena Rybakina takes Kazakhstan past Spain in United Cup debut

Elena Rybakina guided Kazakhstan to a 2-1 victory against Spain in her United Cup debut…

6 hours ago