A larger bench, comprising Justice Aamer Farooq, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kiyani and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, adjourned the petition due to unavailability of the senior lawyer of petitioner Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s Usman Dar.
However, associate lawyer of the counsel for Dar appeared before the bench and submitted a reply before the court.
Khawaja Asif had earlier through his counsel Rashdeen Nawaz submitted a reply in compliance with court orders rejecting the allegations levelled against him by the petitioner.
In his reply, Foreign Minister said that Usman Dar approached the IHC against him over the iqama issue after he could not digest his 2013 election defeat and subsequent dismissal of his petition by the election tribunal and the Supreme Court, challenging the respondent’s victory. He contended that Usman Dar was trying to achieve his mala fide objectives by seeking re-adjudication of the election dispute indirectly through filing of the current petition, which was contrary to the principal of law.
Published in Daily Times, December 1st 2017.
General Zhang Youxia, Vice Chairman of China's Central Military Commission (CMC), has commended the Pakistan…
Punjab Chief Minister (CM) Maryam Nawaz Sharif has expressed her gratitude to the people of…
President of Belarus Aleksandr Lukashenko on Wednesday departed after completing a three-day official visit to…
The recent clashes between the two warring sides in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's Kurram district continued…
A number of United States' lawmakers along with Amnesty International have voiced support for demonstrators…
Hamas is ready to reach a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, a senior official in…
Leave a Comment