Daily Times

A government of coalition partners is not a happy marriage. The growing friction in recent weeks between the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) only shows a deeper challenge in coalition politics – balancing power and respect. As the two ruling partners meet to iron out differences, it is clear that the grievances are neither trivial nor new. They have made their differences public at a time when a formidable foe in the shape of Imran Khan is after the government.

The PPP has repeatedly complained about being excluded from decision-making, especially in Punjab. Governor Saleem Haider alleges that the PML-N has been restricting the PPP’s political activities across Punjab. Retaliatory statements from the Punjab cabinet members further strain their alliance. PPP ranks feel that such actions betray the spirit of partnership.

At the federal level, the situation is no better. PPP Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari has criticised the PML-N for backtracking on promises, particularly regarding equal representation in the judicial commission. Despite the PPP’s support in passing critical legislation like the 26th Constitutional Amendment, Bilawal alleges that their contributions seem to go unrecognised.

This lack of coordination weakens the very coalition. Minority governments rely heavily on alliances, where trust and respect are paramount. The PML-N’s dismissive approach risks isolating its most crucial partner.

The PPP’s frustrations have meat. If this coalition falters, it will not only disrupt federal governance but also destabilise the Punjab government where Khan’s popularity is a reality.

To move forward, both parties must prioritise dialogue and honour commitments. The PML-N must recognise that unilateral decisions alienate allies, while the PPP should seek constructive ways to assert its position. Coalitions are built on compromise, not coercion.

To play a safe game, both parties should reach out to the jailed leader of the PTI. If the coalition is history and if things go the other way, there should not be a repeat of revenge politics. *