Marxism and the Contemporary World

Author: Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed

Marxism Aur Aaj Kee Duniya (Urdu; Marxism and the Contemporary World)
Author: Aslam Gurdaspuri
Publishers: Dastawaiz Mutbuat 2016

Karl Marx is undoubtedly one of the greatest thinkers of all time, whose ideas have profoundly impacted the modern world. A prolific writer, theorist, polemicist and activist, his revolutionary theory of socialism proved to be the most telling indictment of the horrors which the industrial society of the 19th century had generated. Addressing the workers of the world rather than any nation or religious community, he invited them to join ranks to overthrow capitalism. No wonder his ideas reverberated all over the world and found followers who dedicated their lives to realise his ideals in their own society.

Aslam Gurdaspuri is a prominent Pakistani revolutionary poet, writer and political activist who has spent a large part of his life on the barricades in pursuit of another world; a better world in which, finally, the wretched of the earth will be liberated from the fetters of class exploitation and the concomitant cultural prejudices which assume social hierarchy to be natural, as something written in the stars and sanctioned by the gods. As a senior member of the Pakistan People’s Party which — in its pristine phase — promised an end to the old order, Gurdaspuri has inside knowledge of how the powers-that-be obstruct all progressive reform and the old order continues one way or another.

The book is a labour of love. The author begins with a biographical account of Marx’s personal life and his evolution as a thinker and economist. German high philosophy had reached a zenith under the towering influence of Wilhelm Fredrich Hegel, whose Dialectical Idealism attained a hegemonic status in German universities. Under its influence, the State came to represent the highest achievement of civilisation. It was the continuation of a long tradition of philosophy proceeding from premises deriving from religion; rational religion, as Hegel believed Protestantism was. Moreover, Hegel saw the State as the embodiment of the highest good. He therefore favoured reform, rather than revolution, through the superior wisdom invested in the State and represented by the ruling elite.

Marx challenged Hegelian Idealism and instead advanced an opposite theory of the movement in history: that of Dialectical Materialism. It looked beyond the state to the historical struggles between the haves and have-nots, in the final victory of the latter and the end of the State and class society.Marx instead argued that religion was the opium of the masses. By that, he meant that religion helps the masses stoically go through the hardships of capitalism, social misery and the suffering it entails. In that sense, it blunted the revolutionary zeal to overthrow the capitalist system. Therefore, it was the economic base which had to be overthrown to liberate man from social, economic and cultural oppression.

Reviewing Marx’s prolific writings and the wide range of social and political issues that he took up, we learn that Marx was a champion of the free word and was against censorship and restrictions on the press. He believed in the freedom of expression. Marx served as an editor of a famous newspaper and was a contributor of articles as well. Basically, Marx was the founder of the critical school of thought which challenged the truth claims of Western philosophy from the Greeks to Hegel — all of which assumed social hierarchy as natural and inevitable, and sharply distinguished between the intellectual elite and the masses as if these were destined always to exist — as if indicative of the Divine Will.

The author reviews the different debates Marx had with his contemporaries around the nature of reality, the difference between theory and practice, betweenidealism and materialism, between mechanical materialism and dialectical materialism. For Marx, it was not enough for philosophers merely to interpret the world — the real task was to change it. Therefore, the theory of history which Marx developed came to be known as historical materialism: indicating the contradictions between haves and have nots down the ages. It was the actions of the oppressed which provided the motor of change from one mode of production to another.

Having accounted for the overall framework of Marxism theory, Gurdaspuri admits that the predictions Marx made about the future course of history and the direction of change he predicted did not turn out to be correct. Marx had talked about such alternative paths to socialism and so using them is justified, argues the author

Revolutions took place not in the most advanced societies of Western Europe as Marx had said but in Russia and other backward societies. The Bolshevik Revolution and other revolutions based on armed struggle resulted in drastic actions, even extreme actions. The reason was the absence of democratic and peaceful means of bringing about change.

However, in Western Europe, social-democratic parties used democratic and parliamentary methods to advance egalitarian and emancipatory changes. Marx had talked about such alternative paths to socialism and so using them is justified, argues the author. The main thing, argues Gurdaspuri, is that Marx’s struggle to eliminate inequality, oppression, the scourge of war will always be legitimate as long as inequality, poverty, illiteracy and crime and violence ravage the lives of the weak and the vulnerable. However,the means to tackle them and eliminate them will have to change. Barbaric means will have to give way to civilised means of building just societies.

The book is written with a lot of passion and sincerity, and with an open mind. There is no doubt that the author is very well read about not only Marx and Marxism, but also history and politics, and can therefore pay tribute to Marx; but also point out the limitations of any human philosophy or theory. In that sense, it is original and independent. Indeed, the Marxism of the 21st century will have to adjust to the realities of the contemporary world.

The great merit of the book is that it is in Urdu. Such a book is badly needed to inform the younger generations of Pakistan about the great contribution of Marx in the struggle to emancipate mankind from superstition and fatalism and, instead, inculcate rational thought and confidence in the ability of humankind to change the world for the better.

Published in Daily Times, September 18th 2017.

Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Pakistan

Pakistan embarks on first lunar mission

Pakistan's space programme achieved a historic milestone on Friday as the country's first-ever lunar orbiter…

9 mins ago
  • Pakistan

Imran accuses CJP of being ‘biased’ against PTI

Former prime minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan on Friday urged the courts…

9 mins ago
  • Pakistan

IHC rejects IB’s request to withdraw plea for Justice Sattar’s recusal

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) rejected on Friday a plea by the Intelligence Bureau (IB)…

10 mins ago
  • Pakistan

Names finalised for Balochistan, Punjab, KP governors

In a significant development, the appointments of new governors for Punjab, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, and Balochistan have…

12 mins ago
  • Pakistan

Journalist among three killed in Khuzdar blast

An explosion in the Chamrok area of Balochistan's Khuzdar district claimed the lives of at…

13 mins ago
  • Pakistan

20 killed, 21 injured in bus accident on KKH

At least 20 people were killed and 21 others injured on Friday after a passenger…

13 mins ago