Daily Times

Sir: The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, condemning the US drone campaign carried out in the Pakistani tribal areas has termed it as a stark violation of human rights and has called for a UN investigation into drone strikes. Drone strikes according to the UNSG, “raise serious questions about their compliance with international law.” Arrangements for the protection of innocent civilians that become the target of an indiscriminate use of aerial strikes by the CIA ought be made. This lack of transparency is indicative of yet another US failure in its policies and strategies in the war against terror. Many international human rights organisations are working to expose how the CIA-controlled programme is operating in secret, without a clear legal framework and without any accountability to Congress, thus revealing a civil-military disconnect in the US.

The drone strikes are back with a vengeance as, according to Panetta, the “US is running out of patience” and has accelerated drone strikes that are claimed to target key al Qaeda operatives. The fact that Abu Yahya al-Libi, the al Qaeda second in command, was reportedly killed in a recent attack along with 29 other people may be given as a proof of success, but what about the innumerable people who will replace him? Who is responsible for the psychological trauma that the tribal people undergo? The ever-looming fear of death by drones has compelled many to leave their homes and those that remain have no peace.
Chris Woods, a journalist at the British-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism, who exposed CIA drone attacks on rescuers and funeral goers in Pakistan, criticises the US media for not reporting widely the civilian casualties of US drone strikes abroad, which he said give a “warped understanding of what is taking place.” He cites the case of the killing of militant Pakistani leader Badar Mansoor in North Waziristan this year. His death was widely reported, but reports of the others killed were mixed. The Pakistani media has been trying to highlight the counter-productivity of drones in the tribal areas that is only fuelling anti-US sentiments and producing a large number of prospective recruits who will further fuel the insurgency.
The US could do well without the aggressive public remarks and its stance to continue drone strikes in Pakistan if peace is what it actually wants for South Asia. An investigation into the use and the effectiveness of such strikes surely is a dire requirement of the innocent Pakistani civilians.
LUBNA UMER
Islamabad