The federal government has requested the Supreme Court to reject the petitions against the law, maintaining that the applications are an attempt to obstruct the course of justice.
There are ill intentions of the petitioners behind challenging the law, the government response says, adding there are no restrictions on the legislative powers of parliament. The concept of Master of Roster has no legal protection, as per the government stance, adding the law regulates the powers of the chief justice granted under Article 184(3) of the Constitution.
The proposed law does not regulate the powers of the judiciary, it further says, adding the law gives the right to appeal in cases under Article 184(3). Article 10 of the Constitution gives the right to a fair trial, the federal government’s response says. It further says Article 184(3) gives a very limited right to of review, while the right to appeal is essential for a fair trial.
On Wednesday, the core and political committees of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) deliberated on Bushra Bibi's…
In a scathing criticism, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar slammed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) after the party…
The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court has rejected the PTI plea seeking to take…
The first four months of the current fiscal year showed better than expected improvement marked…
Federal Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi has announced that from December 31, no Afghan nationals will…
The ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel, two longstanding rivals, was welcomed by the people of…
Leave a Comment