The court raised questions regarding the evidence of the case and said that there was “no proof” that the money sent by Arif Naqvi was linked with criminal activity. It added that the former premier had not signed any bank documents. According to the IHC, the banking court had rightly said that all the evidence in the case was documentary and an arrest was not necessary. The court maintained that the authority regarding the bank officials belonged to the State Bank of Pakistan, which neither made any inquiry nor declared any transaction received by PTI as illegal.
It continued that the investigating officer also did not record any statement of the SBP officials. One of the charges against Imran was to convert the PTI account to Naya Pakistan account which was deemed “not a crime”. The IHC stated that the Federal Investigation Agency could not substantially answer why the bail should be cancelled. The FIA had registered a case against Imran and ten others regarding claims of foreign funding and the case was registered by the FIA Corporate Banking Circle. The case’s FIR claimed that the accused breached the Foreign Exchange Act and were beneficiaries of a private bank account.
On Wednesday, the core and political committees of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) deliberated on Bushra Bibi's…
In a scathing criticism, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar slammed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) after the party…
The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court has rejected the PTI plea seeking to take…
The first four months of the current fiscal year showed better than expected improvement marked…
Federal Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi has announced that from December 31, no Afghan nationals will…
The ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel, two longstanding rivals, was welcomed by the people of…
Leave a Comment