The court was also requested that the notifications remain suspended until the final decision of this petition is announced.
They petitioners further contended that lawmakers whose resignations were accepted included returned National Assembly candidates “elected vide the general elections 2018 from their respective constituencies as well as MNAs who were elected against reserved seats for women and non-Muslims from the provincial assemblies of Punjab, Sindh and K-P respectively”. “The then-acting Speaker (Deputy Speaker National Assembly Mr Qasim Suri) accepted the resignations but after that the new Speaker giving ruling reversed them with direction to the Secretariat to resubmit the resignations for verification in accordance with the judgments of superior courts,” read the petition.
Subsequently, the incumbent speaker decided to hold inquiry and verify each resignation by calling each MNA individually to confirm whether they were willing and ready to resign. After that, the Speaker summoned them but they did not appear for verification as a result of which their resignations were not accepted. Later, neither did they approach the Speaker nor did he call them for verification and the status quo continued. The original resignations hence became redundant as far as the petitioners are concerned, the petition stated. The resignations were therefore never notified or formally accepted by the National Assembly since, after the change of the regime, the Speaker announced that the process for verification would be undertaken afresh.
Later on, the petitioners contend, the Speaker in violation of the law and his own ruling accepted resignations of the PTI lawmakers in four phases since July 2022-11 in the first phase, 35 each in the second and third phases, and 43 in the fourth phase. The PTI lawmakers had also approached the Islamabad High Court contending the decision of former acting speaker (Qasim Suri) was valid and the decision to reverse the resignations was wrong.
However, the court decided that the then-deputy speaker’s notification, without following the principles of Syed Zafar Ali Shah’s case, was in violation of the Constitution and therefore the process initiated by the Speaker-to call each MNA to verify the genuineness of the resignation-was in consonance with the Constitution.
“The order of the court was binding on the Speaker to call each MNA for verification but the same was not adopted,” stated the petition.
After the Speaker accepted resignations of 35 MNAs first and then 35 more later, the lawmakers pointed in the plea, they tried to meet the speaker but were not allowed. They stated that they also staged a sit-in on the Ministers’ Enclave, but to no avail. “It was shocking for them that the Speaker accepted 43 more resignations. Since that day, the act of accepting resignations by the Speaker without calling any individual MNA for verification has continued,” they contended. The petition requested the court to declare the Speaker’s ruling and the ECP’s notifications illegal and unlawful.
Much of my 2025 will be devoted to co-authoring a book with my great English…
For far too long, India has evaded responsibility for its insidious practices of cross-border terrorism,…
Once bitten, twice shy, yet here we are again, staring at the barrel of a…
Over two years since I first pronounced World War 2.5, primarily due to the increasing…
Before taking a look into Voice of America's controversial journalistic standards; let's enlighten the thoughts…
In recent years, the political and media landscape in Pakistan has become increasingly muddled with…
Leave a Comment