He stated that he was not aware of any statement or undertaking that had been made before the court on behalf of the senior leadership of the PTI or on his behalf during the course of the May 25 long march, nor of the details, including with regard to the D Chowk area issued by the SC. He said that there was no question of him knowingly violating an undertaking made before the court or not following its order.He also sought time till November 3 to file a detailed response into the matter. Meanwhile, Imran Khan’s lawyers Babar Awan and Faisal Chaudhry requested the court to remove their names from the case.In an application submitted, Babar Awan said that he was not nominated in any of the investigation reports prepared by the police or intelligence agencies.
He said that the allegations leveled against them by the government prosecutor were baseless and did not hold any value.Advocate Faisal Chaudhry said that he was a lawyer, not a respondent in the case and hence his name should be removed.
It is to pertinent to mention here that the federal government had filed a petition against Imran Khan for allegedly violating the apex court’s May 25 order regarding PTI’s long march.
Former Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and Bushra Bibi, wife of PTI founder…
US President-elect Donald Trump's transition team has officially signed a memorandum of understanding with the…
Relations between Pakistan and the U.S. have the potential to grow and scale up in…
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan has lauded his party's supporters in Islamabad and D-Chowk,…
Pakistan and Belarus on Tuesday agreed on the early realization of bilateral accords to enhance…
The death toll from the recent violence that has plagued the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's Kurram district…
Leave a Comment