SC raises doubt over Faisal Vawda’s expired passport

Author: Web Desk

The Supreme Court showed concern over yet another allegedly false statement as it resumed the hearing of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Faisal Vawda’s appeal against his lifetime disqualification in the dual nationality case.

Waseem Sajjad, the lawyer for the former minister, made reference to Vawda’s US passport and stated that the returning office (RO) was happy to learn that it had been revoked.

A three member-bench headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Ayesha Malik heard the petition.

However, Justice Ayesha Malik responded by saying that the cancelled passport was expired, adding that the RO was shown the passport in 2018, which had already expired in 2015.

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah of the Supreme Court remarked that court took up the former federal minister’s petition against a lifetime ban imposed on him by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial remarked that the matter had become quite serious.

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah remarked that anther ‘lie’ of Vawda had come to the light.

The lawyer argued that the content of the affidavit was the same and that Vawda did not possess passport of another country.

But Justice Shah corrected the lawyer saying that the affidavit declared that Vawda did not possess the nationality of another country.

Following the remarks by the bench, Vawda’s counsel asked for more time for preparation.

Dual nationality case

In February this year, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) disqualified Faisal Vawda for life from parliament for submitting a false affidavit.

According to the decision announced earlier this year, Vawda, who resigned from his MNA seat to become a senator in elections last year, was also told to return all the perks and privileges he received as a member of the National Assembly.

The PTI senator was disqualified by the  ECP for violating Article 62(1)(f) which pertains to being “sadiq (truthful) and “amin” (honest). The article provision sets the precondition for a member of parliament and is the same provision under which former prime minister Nawaz Sharif was disqualified by Supreme Court on July 28, 2017, in the Panama Papers case.

Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Business

Defiant Trump dismisses stock market’s tariff plunge

President Donald Trump goaded China on Friday after the United States' chief economic rival retaliated…

5 hours ago
  • Business

Pakistan sees economic stability under current govt: Danyal Chaudhry

Parliamentary Secretary for Information and Broadcasting, Barrister Danyal Chaudhry, on Saturday highlighted the country’s progress…

5 hours ago
  • Business

Gold prices decrease by Rs.5,500 to Rs320,000 per tola

The price of 24 karat per tola gold decreased by Rs.5,500 and was traded at…

5 hours ago
  • Business

US starts collecting Trump’s new 10% tariff, smashing global trade norms

U.S. customs agents began collecting President Donald Trump’s unilateral 10% tariff on all imports from…

5 hours ago
  • Business

China says ‘market has spoken’ after US tariffs spark selloff

China said on Saturday “the market has spoken” in rejecting U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs,…

5 hours ago
  • Business

Nissan considers transferring some domestic production to US, Nikkei says

Nissan Motor is considering shifting some domestic production of U.S.-bound vehicles to the U.S., the…

5 hours ago