SC raises doubt over Faisal Vawda’s expired passport

Author: Web Desk

The Supreme Court showed concern over yet another allegedly false statement as it resumed the hearing of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Faisal Vawda’s appeal against his lifetime disqualification in the dual nationality case.

Waseem Sajjad, the lawyer for the former minister, made reference to Vawda’s US passport and stated that the returning office (RO) was happy to learn that it had been revoked.

A three member-bench headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Ayesha Malik heard the petition.

However, Justice Ayesha Malik responded by saying that the cancelled passport was expired, adding that the RO was shown the passport in 2018, which had already expired in 2015.

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah of the Supreme Court remarked that court took up the former federal minister’s petition against a lifetime ban imposed on him by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial remarked that the matter had become quite serious.

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah remarked that anther ‘lie’ of Vawda had come to the light.

The lawyer argued that the content of the affidavit was the same and that Vawda did not possess passport of another country.

But Justice Shah corrected the lawyer saying that the affidavit declared that Vawda did not possess the nationality of another country.

Following the remarks by the bench, Vawda’s counsel asked for more time for preparation.

Dual nationality case

In February this year, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) disqualified Faisal Vawda for life from parliament for submitting a false affidavit.

According to the decision announced earlier this year, Vawda, who resigned from his MNA seat to become a senator in elections last year, was also told to return all the perks and privileges he received as a member of the National Assembly.

The PTI senator was disqualified by the  ECP for violating Article 62(1)(f) which pertains to being “sadiq (truthful) and “amin” (honest). The article provision sets the precondition for a member of parliament and is the same provision under which former prime minister Nawaz Sharif was disqualified by Supreme Court on July 28, 2017, in the Panama Papers case.

Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Business

CDNS attains Rs 600 billion mark in annual savings target

The Central Directorate of National Savings (CDNS) has accomplished a target of Rs 600 billion…

6 hours ago
  • Business

777 planes can land at Faisalabad airport after expansion: Airport manager

About 777 planes could land at Faisalabad International Airport after the expansion of its runway…

6 hours ago
  • Business

Gold prices up by Rs2,100 per tola

The price of 24 karat per tola gold increased by Rs 2,100 and was sold…

6 hours ago
  • Business

Industry leaders push for sustainable policies through collaboration

The government needs to establish long-term and sustainable policies in consultation with the real stakeholders…

6 hours ago
  • Business

Value-added textile export industry be top priority of govt: PHMA

The value-added export-oriented textile industry should be given the top priority of the government, providing…

6 hours ago
  • Business

FRIA wants special incentives for cash-strapped small industry

The Ferozepur Road Industrial Association (FRIA) has asked the government to announce soft financing with…

6 hours ago