The Islamabad High Court (IHC) Thursday extended its stay orders against arrests under PECA Ordinance and accepted the request of attorney general for Pakistan for arguments on March 20 after taking instructions from federation. The court asked the AGP to clarify as to why it should not turn down Section 20 of the PECA. AGP Khalid Jawed informed the court that he would raise the matter with the federal cabinet. The court, however, dismissed the identical cases of Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N) and remarked that it wouldn’t take any actions on the petitions submitted by the opposition. Chief Justice Athar Minallah remarked that the opposition could reject the ordinance in the Senate, as it had enough strength there. Political parties and their workers are responsible for what is happening on the social media, he remarked. He said there was only one question before the court that was why not Section-20 should be terminated. The ordinance, the court said, was contradictory with the Article 19 of the Constitution. The judge reiterated that defamation laws were being decriminalized across the world as he gave examples of Britain and Uganda. The attorney general responded that there were many countries where the law was not decriminalized. Khalid Jawed Khan said Section 20 was not unconstitutional. He, however, added that there was a need to provide safeguards against the misuse of the law. Khalid said he will meet the prime minister as he has a “plan” for changes in the law. The court observed that the PECA Ordinance 2022 was “draconian in nature”, calling it an attempt to muzzle anti-government voices. Justice Minallah said the PECA law was only used to target critics of the government, adding, “it is being said with regret that the proceedings [under PECA] were initiated against individuals who criticised the government.” He said, “It does not look like this is happening in a democratic country.” The court also referred to a case against a neighbour of a PTI lawmaker over criticism. “The FIA harassed the said person,” the court said, calling it a “shocking case”. There are 14,000 complaints pending with the FIA but only the government rivals are being targeted, it added. The chief justice said how can a party, PTI, that rose to fame due to the support it garnered on social media make such legislation. The judge said that the political parties, except the Jamaat-e-Islami, encourage their workers to troll and hurl accusations against opponents on social media “Why are political parties afraid of dissent when they themselves have established social media cells,” the court asked. The state institutions do not have fundamental rights; how can they be included in the aggrieved parties, the court further said, adding that the public bodies shouldn’t be afraid of criticism. He said if the executive was so concerned about his repute then he should remove the “public office holders” from the law. The IHC CJ told the opposition parties to play their role against the PECA ordinance in parliament instead of making petitions in this court. “This court respects parliament and will not initiate proceedings at the request of the political parties,” the IHC CJ said, adding that the government made the ordinance and it should let Senate “accept or reject” it. The PECA ordinance was challenged by the PPP and PML-N along with media bodies and superior bar councils. Addressing the opposition, the IHC CJ said: “You have a majority in the Senate…you have the power to reject the ordinance.” The judge also questioned the urgency to bring the ordinance, saying it was in contrast to Article 19 of the Constitution. Media personality Mohsin Baig’s lawyer Latif Khosa said the National Assembly session was postponed for the sake of the ordinance. The chief justice grilled the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) for abusing its powers in cases against the critics of the government. He said before the amendment to the PECA law, in every case that came before this court, the FIA had abused its authority in complaints involving public officeholders. The judge maintained that through this ordinance, the government is giving the FIA powers to arrest anyone and put them in jail till the conclusion of the trial. “The court has no hesitation in saying that the ordinance is a draconian law,” he added. The FIA has been reduced to saving the reputation of officeholders, said CJ Minallah, asking whether the agency had nothing else to do. He said the ordinance will result in self-censorship, adding that the law was even worse than the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) law. “People will stop writing out of fear of this law,” he added. Speaking further about the FIA, Justice Minallah said the cybercrime agency had submitted SOPs for arrest in the court but it still did not follow them. “Such is the highhandedness of the FIA,” he added. The IHC said the FIA picked up two journalists from Lahore under the PECA law. “These journalists were picked up in a manner that they weren’t even told the reason for their detention,” the court said, adding that they remained “disappeared” for quite some time. When asked about the arrests, the FIA said a complaint was registered against them. Justice Minallah said one of the journalists was picked up for quoting a history book in his vlog. “Now, it is not even allowed for anyone to cite history,” he questioned. The attorney general of Pakistan (AGP) contested, saying this didn’t happen. The CJ also remarked on the confiscation of Mohsin Baig’s laptop from his house, saying the government was even targeting the “sources of journalists” even though media persons are not asked about their sources. The AGP said he will take up the issue with the cabinet members. Subsequently, the hearing in the case was adjourned till March 10.