MELBOURNE: Tennis world number one Novak Djokovic won a temporary reprieve in his deportation from Australia on Thursday, but is set to spend the night in an immigration detention facility as he fights to remain in the country. The vaccine-sceptic Serb was detained at Melbourne’s Tullamarine Airport having failed to “provide appropriate evidence” of double vaccination, or a medical exemption needed to enter the country. Djokovic had jetted into Australia on Wednesday hoping to defend his Australian Open crown and to bid for an unprecedented 21st Grand Slam title. Instead of a conquering champion’s welcome, he was questioned at the airport overnight before having his visa revoked and being transferred to a Melbourne immigration detention facility pending deportation. After an emergency online court appeal, a judge ordered that the controversial star would not be removed from Australia before Monday, when a final hearing is scheduled to begin. With scarcely 10 days before the tournament, it remains far from clear that Djokovic will be able to play, even if he wins in court. Judge Anthony Kelly warned that justice will move at its own pace through all necessary appeals. “The tail won’t be tagging the dog here,” he warned the star’s lawyers. Wrong court: For months there had been speculation about whether Djokovic would play in the January 17-30 tournament, given Australia’s rigid border rules. The 34-year-old has refused to reveal his vaccine status, but has previously voiced opposition to being jabbed. He has contracted Covid at least once. Then this week a jubilant Djokovic boasted on Instagram that he had scored an unexpected medical exemption to play. That move prompted widespread outcry in Australia, where many residents have been unable to travel or welcome family from overseas for the last two years. Conservative Prime Minister Scott Morrison — under additional pressure from soaring Covid case numbers and the collapse of the once-excellent testing system — defended revoking Djokovic’s visa at the last minute. “Rules are rules and there are no special cases,” he said. Officials did not say exactly what evidence Djokovic failed to present, but medical exemptions must be accompanied by details of the doctor’s consultation and clear reasons for not getting the vaccine. ‘So sad’: Djokovic is now believed to be at the Park Hotel, which the Australian government terms an “Alternative Place of Detention”. As word of his arrival spread, Serbian flag-festooned supporters, anti-vaccine campaigners, refugee advocates and police descended on the already controversial facility. At least one pro-refugee protester was arrested in chaotic scenes as officers tried to clear the area. Veronica Michich said she was there to show support for Djokovic, whom she described as a beacon of hope for post-war Serbia. “We see him as a hero. He put Serbia back on the map, because Serbia was always portrayed, we were the aggressive ones, we were the attackers.” Currently around 32 refugees and asylum seekers are being held at the Park Hotel, after being brought for medical treatment from offshore detention facilities. Detainees cannot leave the hotel and nobody is allowed in or out except staff. Diplomatic incident: Rafael Nadal ––– who like Djokovic and Roger Federer is stuck on a record-equalling 20 Grand Slam wins ––– said his rival must face the consequences of not being vaccinated. “He made his own decisions, and everybody is free to take their own decisions, but then there are some consequences,” the Spaniard said. The Serb’s treatment prompted fury among his fans and a fiercely worded rebuke from Serbia’s president. “The whole of Serbia is with him and… our authorities are undertaking all measures in order that maltreatment of the world’s best tennis player ends as soon as possible,” President Aleksandar Vucic said after speaking with Djokovic over the phone. “In line with all standards of international public law, Serbia will fight for Novak Djokovic, justice and truth.” John Findley, an Australian immigration lawyer, said both the state and Djokovic would have to answer some tough questions in court. Experts said that charge could bring a three-year ban from applying for another Australian visa. But Findley also said the visa revocation seems to have come from “a pile on from social media” and government would need to explain the legal bar that Djokovic failed to meet. Tournament organisers also face difficult questions.