Reviewing a book by Haruki Murakami is to some degree a redundant act. Whatever the phenomenally popular Japanese writer knocks out will sell by the truckload – the reviews just notify his throng of devotees that it’s time to buy a new Murakami. All of which loosens my natural hesitancy to lay into a septuagenarian so that I can divulge up front that his latest, First Person Singular, is not very good. Murakami’s 22nd book is a collection of eight short stories, some of them more obviously fictional than others, all narrated in the first person by an elderly writer. Among its themes are nostalgia, music and erotic reminiscence. The book is not without its charms and Murakami’s mild and affable authorial persona will please his fans. While his novels tend towards the baroque and the fantastical, First Person Singular works best when Murakami keeps it simple in stories that resemble memoir and recount affairs, friendships or one-night stands from bygone decades. The enjoyable second story, on a Stone Pillow, tells of a teenage night spent with a poet who yells another man’s name when she comes. Carnaval recounts a music-based friendship the narrator enjoyed when he was 50 with “the ugliest” woman he has ever known Charlie Parker Plays Bossa Nova begins promisingly, with the narrator analysing a short story he’d published as a student, which purports to review a newly unearthed album by the great jazz musician. Halfway through, however, the metafiction takes such a silly turn that calling it bargain-basement Borges would be giving it too much credit. Worse is to come in Confessions of a Shinagawa Monkey, a childish tale of a talking monkey that made me feel I was being treated like a simpleton. That this story was first published in the New Yorker suggests not only that Murakami isn’t even trying, but that he no longer has to. “Theme?” he writes, addressing an imaginary editor. “Can’t say there is one.” While Murakami’s more thrilling novels contain war crimes, sexual deviancy and other sinister elements, the abiding tone here is of grandfatherly niceness. It leaves you craving an edge, which only arrives in the final, titular story, and even then inconclusively. First Person Singular’s blandly nostalgic musings on, say, watching baseball at a stadium in Tokyo would go down without much friction if only Murakami wrote better prose. A biographical note on the author informs us that “Murakami writes with admirable discipline, producing 10 pages a day”. I’d admire it too if my bank account swelled as the words piled up. Seeing as it doesn’t, what I find instead is lazy, halfhearted prose and what I’ve come to think of as Murakami’s trademark banality. He occasionally strives towards insight, but leaves off before getting anywhere. Often, he doesn’t even bother. On learning of the death of a former lover, the narrator reflects: “I couldn’t grasp the fact that she’d died and no longer existed in this world. I’m not sure how to put it – it seemed so surreal.” In a later story, we are told: “I don’t know how to put it, but it seemed important to me.” To which the reader is entitled to respond: try harder! There are grating repetitions, pointless disavowals and statements of the blindingly obvious. To be charitable, we might put all this down to the late-career trailing off of a much-loved storyteller. The cynic in me wonders if the bizarrely limp style is a performance calculated to disarm: insipid Murakami the non-threatening crowdpleaser – the Forrest Gump of global literature.