There is no ‘I’ in lawyer

Author: Barrister Osman Rehman Syed

One does not need to spend a lot of time in the courts of Pakistan to notice a trend: lawyers and advocates in courts while arguing their cases refer to their clients in terms of ‘I’. Put simply, when an advocate or a lawyer is arguing their case they become personally vested in the matter and that becomes evident from the fact that instead of referring to their client in the case, they refer to themselves as the client e.g. I have suffered this loss, I entered into this contract, etc.

There is an arguable case against referring to clients in the first person. The primary argument is the fact that once lawyers blur this line between case and client they are no longer acting as impartial advocates for their client’s case, but are instead acting in a biased personal capacity. This is not to say that lawyers should not defend the case of their clients fiercely, they most certainly should; however, to argue a case in the first person is actually counter-intuitive for a lawyer because it hampers their independent legal reasoning. The end result is that instead of lawyers arguing cases through sound legal doctrines and notions they end up using emotions to plead their client’s case, which in turn goes against established legal machinery.

Emotions, facts, and legal principles should be kept separate and must not be mixed. A lawyer who becomes personally invested in their client’s case will take all the remarks by the opposing advocate in that same personal capacity, and thus will not be able to separate emotions from professionalism. Once emotions and professionalism become entangled it gets harder to see the bigger picture as sound judgment is clouded.

This proliferate use of ‘I’ by lawyers to refer to their clients may be one of the, though not the only or main, reasons why violence is resorted to in the courts of Pakistan. Lawyers, by using the word ‘I’, end up reinforcing the notion of being personally vested in cases, and as a result, consciously or subconsciously, start arguing cases on an emotional rather than legal and professional level.

Thus, there needs to be a shift in how lawyers conduct themselves in court and how they represent their clients and the first step towards that shift would be to modify how lawyers represent and refer to their clients in court so that, at least subconsciously, a distinction can be drawn between emotions and logic.

Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Business

PRGMEA desires separate ‘Apparel Policy’ for share in US future marketa

The Pakistan Readymade Garments Manufacturers and Exporters Association (PRGMEA) calling for the revision of the…

4 hours ago
  • Business

Brazilian envoy urges Pakistan to join BRICS to become part of global economy

Ambassador of Brazil to Pakistan, Olyntho Vieira has urged Pakistan to join international multilateral forum…

4 hours ago
  • Business

Gold price increases to Rs229,500 a tola

Gold price in the country increased by Rs100 per tola on Wednesday following an uptick…

4 hours ago
  • Business

PKR moves up to 278.04 against USD

The Pakistani rupee continued inching up against the US dollar in the inter-bank market on…

4 hours ago
  • Business

PSX stays bullish, gains 641 more points

The 100-index of the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) continued with bullish trend on Wednesday, gaining…

4 hours ago
  • Business

Oil prices dip on demand concerns

Crude oil prices slumped on Wednesday as an unexpected increase in US crude inventories stoked…

4 hours ago