How financial swindlers operate?

Author: Daily Times

Sir: Prosecution was aghast when defence lawyer asked whether opening a fake account constitutes a criminal charge. The Zardari-Faryal-Talpur case is being investigated since 2003. Yet, prosecution is banking on harassment of innocent witnesses (according to media reports).

Our prosecutors should learn to connect the dots and build a hard-bound case. Financial offenders are clever or commit offences with help of clever lawyers. Take India for example.

Diamond merchant Mehul Choksi’s cousin Nirav Modi is a specialist in acquisitions and disposals of corporate vehicles which primarily own and manage an underlying real estate asset. He built up an expertise in acting on private mergers, acquisitions and disposals in the children’s nurseries, dental practices and other sectors.

He complicated India’s discussions with British authorities on the case by raising issues on data protection, claimed political asylum in Britain, so on. His uncle Mehul Choksi obtained citizenship of the Caribbean island of Antigua.

India sent three letters to the U.K. seeking assistance in its investigation against Mr. Modi in March and April. The letters have been forwarded to the Serious Fraud Office, without avail. What was Choksi and his companies’ modus operandi?

He availed credit from overseas branches of Indian banks using the fraudulent guarantees of Punjab National Bank (PNB) given through letters of undertaking (LoUs) and letters of credit issued by the Brady House branch which were not repaid, bringing liability on the state-run bank. An LoU is a guarantee given by an issuing bank to Indian banks having branches abroad to grant short-term credit to the applicant. Mehul Choksi, architect of Rs 14,000 crore bank fraud, was “using several dummy companies” to rotate funds and to divert money for his personal use.

In the PNB fraud case, the bank employees had sent these guarantees (unauthorized letters of undertakings in the absence of credit limits and collateral security).

It is doubtful if our NAB or FIA have acumen to understand offenders’ tricks, intricacies of foreign prosecution, and extradition treaties. We lose cases even after paying hefty fees to international and home-grown media-savvy lawyers.

DEEBA MALIK

Islamabad

Published in Daily Times, September 16th 2018.

Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Pakistan

PML-N submits resolution in Punjab Assembly for banning PTI

  Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader and Member of the Provincial Assembly (MPA) Rana Muhammad…

34 mins ago
  • Pakistan

SC rejects plea to ban candidates contesting from several constituencies

Supreme Court (SC) has dismissed a petition seeking to impose a ban on candidates contesting…

1 hour ago
  • Pakistan

Pakistan receives $500m from ADB under disaster resilience program

The central bank on Thursday announced that it had received $500 million from the Asian…

1 hour ago
  • Pakistan

Salman Akram Raja resigns as PTI’s secretary general

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Salman Akram Raja resigned from his position as the party's secretary…

1 hour ago
  • Pakistan

IHC issues contempt notice to PTI over Nov 24 protest

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has issued a contempt of court notice to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf…

1 hour ago
  • Business

Meeting held to review progress on investment, privatization

In light of the recent visit of a high-level Pakistani delegation to Azerbaijan, an important…

1 hour ago