The recent U.S. decision to impose a 29% tariff increase on Pakistani exports, citing concerns over “fairness” due to Pakistan’s reported 58% duties on American goods, has sparked significant debate. While the move aims to address trade imbalances, it risks overlooking the nuanced realities of Pakistan’s trade policies and sidestepping established WTO frameworks. This approach could strain Pakistan’s export economy while inadvertently affecting American consumers and diplomatic relations. At the heart of this issue are the communities dependent on Pakistan’s textile and manufacturing sectors. Millions of workers, from factory employees to cotton farmers, face uncertainty as these tariffs could disrupt livelihoods critical to the nation’s economic fabric. However, context is key: the cited 58% duties referenced by the U.S. largely reflect targeted protections permitted under WTO guidelines for developing economies. Such measures mirror strategies historically employed by the U.S. and other nations during their own developmental phases. The ripple effects of this decision extend beyond borders. American consumers may soon encounter higher prices for everyday goods, from medical supplies to apparel, as supply chains adjust. Diplomatically, this unilateral step risks undermining years of bilateral cooperation, raising questions about the prioritization of collaborative solutions over punitive measures. The WTO’s role in curbing unilateral actions is vital to maintaining trust among nations. There is a constructive path forward. Pakistan has consistently expressed willingness to engage in dialogue to address trade concerns transparently. Rather than escalating tariffs, both nations could benefit from renewed negotiations grounded in mutual respect and adherence to international trade norms. Pakistan seeks not special privileges but equitable treatment within the WTO framework, a system designed to balance the interests of all economies, large and small. This situation underscores a broader question: Can the global trade system uphold fairness without allowing power dynamics to overshadow shared rules? The WTO’s role in curbing unilateral actions is vital to maintaining trust among nations. If exceptions are made for one, it risks eroding the collective commitment to a rules-based order. Pakistan’s response should balance principled advocacy with pragmatism. Pursuing WTO-mediated resolutions while expanding trade partnerships can foster resilience. It’s important to distinguish between safeguarding vulnerable industries in a developing economy and protectionism that stifles fair competition. Sustainable trade thrives on reciprocity, not pressure. Ultimately, enduring trade relationships are built on collaboration, not confrontation. Pakistan remains open to dialogue aimed at fostering equilibrium, a stance that invites the U.S. to revisit the negotiating table in a spirit of cooperation. The alternative-a fragmented global trade landscape where rules apply unevenly-serves no nation’s long-term interests. Let this moment be an opportunity to reaffirm that fairness and dialogue, not force, pave the way for shared prosperity. The writer is a freelance Content Writer & Columnist. She can be reached at: rakhshandamehtab @gmail.com