Pakistan’s Information Minister Atta Tarar recently criticized Imran Khan’s party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, for issuing a call for civil disobedience, mocking them as being disobedient themselves and their false narratives falling flat in the court of people. Many other ministers are following suit, showing confidence in no potential threat to either their government or the economy. According to the latest news, the party itself is considering other options and is said to have pushed the formula to the back bench. However, boycotting or not, PTI’s willingness to go down this spiral has sparked controversy and raised concerns about its interest in the stability and future of the country. Pakistan has a long history of political turmoil and instability. With a complex mix of ethnic, religious, and regional tensions, the country has struggled to find a stable footing in the world of politics. Imran Khan’s rise to power as Prime Minister was seen as a beacon of hope for many, promising to bring about much-needed change and reforms. Yet, ever since his parliamentary ouster, his readiness to go beyond the ordinary and not stop at any red lines, and the same holy banter seems to have become the biggest thorn in his side. Had it been better times, any other party’s decision to urge its supporters to engage in acts of civil disobedience, spell an end to foreign remittances, and issue boycotts of local products, must have been seen as a dangerous move that could further destabilize the country by the PTI Founder. Interestingly, because it is his thumbprint on the signature line, his supporters are scampering in search of justifications. According to them, nothing matters more than their political agenda and going by this logic, Pakistan is just a moot point in the race. According to its leaders, nothing matters more than their political agenda and going by this logic, Pakistan is just a moot point in the race. The country is already grappling with a host of challenges, from economic woes to security concerns. The last thing the country needs is a wave of civil disobedience that could disrupt daily life, business activities, and the functioning of essential services. Such a move could set off a chain reaction of protests, clashes with law enforcement agencies, and a general breakdown of law and order. Pakistan’s democracy is still in its nascent stages, and any disruption to the democratic process could have far-reaching consequences. The call for civil disobedience undermines the very foundations of democracy and the rule of law, creating a dangerous precedent for future political movements. As someone who claims to be the only responsible political party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf should be mindful of the impact its actions have on the country and its people. Issuing calls for civil disobedience without considering the repercussions shows a lack of foresight and leadership. Instead of resorting to tactics that sow discord and division, political parties in Pakistan should focus on fostering dialogue, cooperation, and consensus-building. Only through peaceful means and democratic processes can the country move forward and address its myriad challenges. The writer is a freelance columnist.