In a troubling turn of events, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) finds itself mired in controversy following its recent protests in Islamabad, which have sparked widespread unrest and economic disruption. What happened at D-Chowk was far removed from the self-concoted ideas of peaceful protest as innumerable participants were seen eager to attack the law enforcement authorities under the guise of practising their constitutionally-protected right to protest. The party’s demonstrations, characterized by violence and chaos, have raised serious concerns about PTI’s intentions and impact on the nation’s stability. Since a court order had already mandated PTI to first secure a certificate of no-objection before planning any such move, the real responsibility for whatever happened afterwards falls primarily on the leadership. Reports indicate that the protests have resulted in staggering economic losses, estimated at a daily rate of Rs. 192 billion, as outlined by the Interior Ministry. This alarming figure prompts critical questions regarding the prevailing motivations of PTI’s leadership, particularly in light of the significant harm inflicted on ordinary citizens and the economy. The reckless dissemination of misleading information, as part of PTI’s anti-state agenda, raises alarm bells about the party’s commitment to democratic values and public welfare. Amidst the unrest, the PTI leadership has been accused of orchestrating a baseless propaganda campaign aimed at distorting reality and manipulating public sentiment. Allegations have surfaced regarding the deaths of protesters, with PTI leaders presenting wildly varying figures: Salman Akram Raja reported 20 fatalities, Sher Afzal Marwat mentioned 12, while Ali Amin Gandapur claimed 100, and Latif Khosa suggested an alarming total of 278. Such contradictory assertions have only served to deepen public scepticism. In stark contrast to these claims, credible sources such as the PIMS and Polyclinic hospitals have contested the existence of any deceased individuals. According to PIMS, 102 injured individuals – 66 law enforcement personnel and 36 civilians – were treated, but crucially, no bodies were reported to have been admitted to either medical facility, undermining PTI’s narrative. What is one to make of these endless figures, which are not being validated by any credible evidence? Should one then dare say that the blood and sweat of those easily swayed lambs brought from the nooks of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has been tarnished in the name of petty political gains? Aleema Khan or Bushra Bibi, Ali Amin Gandapur or Hammad Azhar, is anyone standing in a position where they can defend the decisions taken on the chaotic evening of November 24? Critics argue that this manipulation of information not only tarnishes Pakistan’s image on the international stage but also threatens the fabric of democratic discourse in the country. The reckless dissemination of misleading information, as part of PTI’s anti-state agenda, raises alarm bells about the party’s commitment to democratic values and public welfare. The PTI leadership’s tactics, which appear to prioritize political gain over national stability, urge citizens to take a stand against such divisive manoeuvres. It is imperative for the public to demand accountability and transparency from their leaders, fostering an environment where integrity and ethical conduct are paramount. As Pakistan navigates these turbulent times, it is crucial for citizens to remain vigilant against baseless propaganda and political deception. Together, we can uphold democratic principles and secure a brighter, more stable future for our nation. Pakistan would have to choose a path of its own where it does not allow vendettas to cloud the international community’s judgement. Its sovereignty is at stake and it is high time those tasked with the responsibility of its sustenance rise to the occasion. The writer is a freelance columnist.