ISLAMABAD: Justice Gulzar Ahmad, member of larger bench hearing the Panamagate Case, on Monday said the Sharifs may face legal consequences if they failed to present the money trail of the London flats. However, Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, who heads the larger bench, observed that someone can only be disqualified on the basis of “black letter law” and not on people’s “expectations”. He also said everyone should wait for the final verdict instead of delivering speeches. During the hearing, Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) lawyer Taufiq Asif contended that the PM’s speech on the floor of the House was in violation of the parliamentary rules. He added that the case is about the Sharifs, not the government, adding that National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq allowed the PM to deliver a speech after suspending the proceedings of the House. When Justice Saeed told him to argue the case keeping in view Article 69, Asif contended that the PM’s speech was not within the ambit of Article 69 as it addressed allegations levelled against an individual, the PM. Justice Khosa remarked that if none of the parties in the case had any reservations regarding the speech then why the record should be summoned. The JI’s lawyer said that no money trail had been provided by the PM’s counsel regarding the London flats. The bench instructed the JI’s lawyer to wrap up his arguments on Tuesday (today).