ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan is considering the deliberations on the request of federal government for constituting an inquiry commission comprising top court’s judges to probe the people named in Panama Papers. Sources on the condition of anonymity on Monday claimed that after the arrival of Chief Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali from Turkey the SC has now been active in considering the deliberations on the request of federal government while the letter of government and proposed Terms of References (ToRs) are being discussed informally before formal consultation. However, SC’s spokesperson denied the reports and stated that no such full court meeting is being held over the issue. On April 22, the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, whose family members are named in Panama Leaks, announced a request to Chief Justice of Pakistan for the formation of a commission to probe the allegations leveled against his family and him. Following the announcement, the government issued a letter to SC for a three member inquiry commission under Section 3(1) of the Pakistan Commission of Inquiry Act, 1956. However, legal experts believe that the role of opposition parties is ambiguous adding on one hand they demand inquiry led by chief justice while on other side the opposition parties brought consensus for legislation to probe the leaks. “Supreme Court is not a political entity nor should it be used for political purposes. It was the primary responsibility of opposition to make ToRs before chief justice came to Pakistan,” said Advocate Faisal Chaudhary. Legal experts further believing that All Parties Conference for deciding the ToRs is lesser important as the matter is in SC while chief justice’s decision and recommendation will have significant impact on fate of the matter. However, Pakistan Bar Council Vice Chairman Dr. Farogh Nasim while rejecting the government’s ToRs believes that there is no need to introduce specific legislation for inquiring into Panama Leaks.